Editorial standards
Because our reports concern people's money and companies' reputations, we hold what we publish to clear standards for accuracy, fairness, and correction.
Accuracy and sourcing
We publish assessments based on observable evidence and corroborated reports, not rumour. Where a claim is a user's personal account, it is presented as such. Strong verdicts — particularly a "Scam" designation — require more than a single unverifiable complaint.
Fairness and right of reply
Any company named on Brokers Verify may respond to what we publish about it. We review every good-faith request, consider evidence the company provides, and update the record where the evidence supports a change. A company that resolves the issues behind a report can have its assessment re-reviewed.
Corrections
When we get something wrong, we fix it promptly and, where the change is material, note that a correction was made. To request one, email contact@brokersverify.com with the page URL and the specific facts in dispute, along with any supporting evidence.
Independence and conflicts of interest
We do not accept payment from covered companies in exchange for ratings, removals, or favourable treatment, and we do not operate pay-to-remove schemes. If a relationship ever existed that could be seen as a conflict, it would be disclosed on the relevant page.
Moderation of community content
User-submitted reports and comments are moderated before publication. We remove content that is spam, harassment, or clearly false, and we may decline to publish material we cannot reasonably stand behind. Readers can flag any post for re-review.
Disputes
For corrections, takedown requests, or legal concerns, contact contact@brokersverify.com. We aim to acknowledge good-faith disputes quickly and resolve them on the evidence.
Last updated June 2026